October 23, 2021
What We’re Standing Against
Sneaky union giveaways
Quick summary: How do you show you’re biased toward unions without saying you’re biased toward unions? Democrats know the answer: Sneak a bunch of union handouts into multi-trillion-dollar spending sprees and claim they’re for infrastructure and social welfare. At whose expense? American taxpayers, workers, and businesses.
What’s happening? Right now, Democrats are trying to jam a $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill and a multi-trillion-dollar reconciliation package through Congress. Both bills include provisions that would dish out political favors to unions, penalize companies that don’t unionize, and ramp up costs for all Americans.
First, infrastructure: A little-known rule from nearly 100 years ago is already hiking up costs for America’s infrastructure. It’s called the Davis-Bacon Act, and it requires construction projects that receive federal funding to pay workers a prevailing wage. Who sets the prevailing wage? The Department of Labor…that’s right, the government. How does this favor unions? It’s mainly unionized companies that pay prevailing wage salaries, so they’re more likely to be chosen for federally-funded construction projects.
Take a second and think of all the non-unionized workers this rule has deprived of job opportunities—simply because their employers don’t abide by Washington’s rules.
Now guess what the infrastructure bill would do. Yep, it’d tie most infrastructure funding to Davis-Bacon requirements. The White House even said that “the overwhelming majority of the funds in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act will be subject to Davis-Bacon requirements” to “support…union jobs.”
But Davis-Bacon doesn’t just hurt non-unionized companies and workers; it has costly consequences for all Americans. Under Davis-Bacon, the government jacks up required wages. Studies show that prevailing wages can drive the costs of projects 20% higher than market cost. As of just a few years ago, carpenters’ prevailing wages in Nassau-Suffolk, New York, were 30% above market. Electricians and plumbers’ prevailing wages were 45.5% and 58.7% above market, respectively.
Reminder: Government money is ultimately taxpayers’ money. When bills for federal construction projects balloon because of Davis-Bacon, taxpayers bear the burden. Estimates show that repealing the Davis-Bacon Act could save taxpayers an estimated $10.9 billion a year in federal construction costs.
With the Democrats’ reconciliation bill, the union giveaways get worse. They’re still negotiating their package, but these harmful items have reportedly made it in:
- Democrats want to keep offering an existing $7,500 tax credit to Americans who buy electric vehicles (EVs). But there’s a catch: They want to give an extra $4,500 in tax credits to those who buy an EV from a unionized company. What do unions have to do with climate change? Short answer: nothing. As the leaders of one car company, Toyota, point out, “To state the obvious, an EV made by autoworkers who choose to unionize does not make that vehicle any better for the environment.”
- The bill also includes a measure that would block companies from hiring workers to replace others who have gone on strike. What’s the problem? Union strikes are already on the rise this year—especially with the worker shortages and inflation we’re seeing under Bidenomics. If companies can’t replace striking workers, unionized workers will feel all the more empowered to walk off the job—further delaying much-needed infrastructure projects and keeping jobs from Americans who actually want to work.
What else do you need to know? Rigid labor union rules are partly to thank for the record backlog of ships waiting to be unloaded at two California ports. For years, power-hungry unions have slowed down port operations by threatening to stop working if companies don’t meet their demands (i.e., higher wages). They’ve also blocked efficiency-boosting innovations. The result? America’s ports rank among the worst worldwide; yet unionized port workers rake in between $170,000 and $280,000 a year.
It’s unions like these that the Democrats are trying to boost with your taxpayer money.
What are Republicans doing? Fighting for workers and against union power grabs. In April, Rep. Bob Good (R-VA) introduced legislation to repeal the Davis-Bacon Act and protect businesses and workers from manipulative unions. As Rep. Good said:
“Without repealing Davis-Bacon, the Biden infrastructure plan is a taxpayer-funded gift to big union bosses. It is simple: [The] Davis-Bacon Act drives up prices for taxpayer-funded construction and eliminates opportunities for hardworking Americans.” – Rep. Bob Good
Our take: Democrats have revealed their hand. We already know they don’t care about saving taxpayer dollars. But their spending wish lists have made it abundantly clear that wasting those dollars to give unions a leg up is one of their top priorities. When it comes to far-left spending sprees, American workers, businesses, and taxpayers play second fiddle to big labor bosses.
→ Read more: Biden’s inept economic policies indirectly causing strikes, unionizing efforts (Heritage Foundation)
→ Read more: Republicans can save trillions while approving infrastructure package (The Hill)
A free Cuba 🇨🇺
Quick summary: It’s been just over 100 days since freedom-loving Cubans launched one of the largest anti-communism protests in decades. Now, we’ve learned that Cuba’s tyrants have been brutally oppressing the protesters they arrested. Sadly, this comes as no surprise. Communism is an evil ideology that cannot survive without violence, abuse, and censorship.
What happened? On July 11, thousands of Cubans took to the streets to demand an end to the cruelty they’ve suffered at the hands of communism for more than 60 years. They marched together—chanting “liberty,” waving American flags, and calling for Cuba’s dictator—Miguel Díaz-Canel—to step down.
Instead of stepping down, the Cuban regime cracked down. Even though the protests were almost 100% peaceful, Díaz-Canel called for his supporters to respond with violence, saying, “The order to fight has been given.” Díaz-Canel’s security forces flooded the streets, threw protesters to the ground, deployed tear gas, and arrested over 1,000 people—including journalists, activists, artists, and ordinary citizens.
What’s happened since? For the past three months, Cuban officials have been subjecting innocent Cubans to torture, interrogation, and communist indoctrination. Here are some specifics:
- Horrendous conditions: Many prisoners have been held in cramped, dirty prison cells—with no beds, insufficient food supplies, and limited access to clean water. Some have been deprived of sleep while officers beat them and cut off all natural light from their cells.
- Humiliation and indoctrination: Officers forced one 17-year-old female prisoner to strip naked. After forcing another prisoner—a dissenting journalist—to take off his clothes, officers spent hours upbraiding him with stories about Communist Cuba’s glorious founding under Fidel Castro. He said, “I felt violated.”
- Torture: Cuban officers hauled one 20-year-old protester into an interrogation room, threatened to shoot his family, and beat him so fiercely with a baton that he was in pain for 20 consecutive days. One woman was thrown into a filthy cell for refusing to shout “Viva Fidel!” Every time she bravely resisted demands to yell out this communist cry, officers beat her.
The abuse isn’t over: Around 500 Cubans—including some children—are still detained. We don’t know much about their conditions, but it’s safe to assume they’re suffering, too.
What are Republicans doing? Fighting to support Cuban freedom. Reps. Claudia Tenney (R-NY) and Maria Elvira Salazar (R-FL) introduced legislation that would push the Biden administration to provide more anti-censorship tools—so the Cuban people can get around Díaz-Canel’s internet crackdowns. Rep. Tenney explained, “The United States must use the tools at our disposal to help the Cuban people overcome their government’s censorship efforts.”
What happens next? Cuban dissidents, actors, and artists are planning another anti-communism protest for November 15. But the regime’s tyrants have already banned it. They’re hoping they’ve instilled enough terror to stifle another call for freedom. Here’s what we know: The world will be watching.
Our take: Remember when Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) praised Cuba’s communist leaders for their education system? How about when Black Lives Matter defended the Cuban regime for “demonstrat[ing] solidarity with oppressed peoples”? These liberals are painting a false picture of what happens when communism takes root.
The horrors from the past few months paint the real picture—of a cruel, communist government that will crush anyone who dares to speak up or stand in the way of its crusade toward infinite power. Cuba’s dictators enslave innocent people, murder dissidents, persecute the religious, and silence anyone who disagrees with them. This is the brutal, ugly face of communism. And socialism—communism’s dangerous sister—doesn’t look much different.
But if you don’t want to listen to us, at least listen to the Cubans who are crying out: “Freedom! Down with communism!”
→ Read more: Cuban protester who tore apart image of Fidel Castro sentenced to 10 years in jail (Miami Herald)
→ Read more: GOP lawmakers push legislation to counter internet censorship of Cuban dissidents (Washington Times)